EE v. State of California

March 4, 2022
On February 28, 2022, the federal court for the Northern District of California ruled that disabled students in California must have access to a virtual education program equivalent to what non-disabled students receive. If a parent decides that their disabled child’s health would be put at risk by in-person instruction, school districts must permit enrollment to the district’s independent study program with access to the student’s IEP service or provide a reasonable modification in the form of virtual access to student’s typical instruction and special education services. [...]

DREDF Files Amicus Brief on Behalf of Itself and Eighteen Other Organizations Opposing Efforts to Establish a Constitutional Right to Assisted Suicide in Massachusetts

February 27, 2022
The question of whether a constitutional right to assisted suicide exists must be addressed and understood from the perspective of the class of people who will be most adversely impacted if such a right is found – people with disabilities, whether terminally ill or not. On February 14, 2022, DREDF filed an amicus brief on behalf of itself and eighteen other organizations in Kligler v. Healy to provide such a perspective. Kligler is an appeal before the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts that seeks to establish a constitutional right to assisted suicide. The nineteen amici are recognized authorities in the field of disability rights who oppose the legalization of assisted suicide. The brief of amici discusses how assisted suicide discriminates against people with disabilities, degrades their perceived value and worth, and puts them at higher risk of discrimination and abuse. [...]

Thousands Join Growing Effort to Protect Disability Rights Laws

February 15, 2022
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA — Nearly 10,000 people from more than 800 different organizations and agencies have signed an online petition spearheaded by two California-based disability civil rights organizations – Disability Rights and Education Defense Fund (DREDF) and Disability Rights California (DRC) – demanding that the Los Angeles Community College District (LACCD) suspend efforts to eliminate protections afforded under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. Supporters signing the petition include the Honorable Tony Coelho and Steve Bartlett, two of the original authors of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as well as disability activist and Obama administration leader The Honorable Dr. Judith Heumann. [...]

DREDF and Bazelon submit Comments on Proposed Federal Rule Updating ACA Health Exchanges and Benefits

January 27, 2022
DREDF and our colleagues at the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law commented on all these aspects of the proposed rule. Non-discriminatory benefit design in healthcare is especially important for people with disabilities, including those with mental health disabilities, who have experienced both obvious and subtle discrimination in insurance for decades such as visit limits, "special" co-pays, and outright failure to cover services and items that are medically necessary for mostly people with disabilities. In our comments, we recommend that plan spending on improving health equity for people with disabilities, such as by helping providers to get accessible examination equipment, could and should be considered a quality improvement that doesn't count toward an insurer's profits. We also pointed out how telehealth has been inaccessible for people who are Deaf or who have other communications disabilities. Finally, we pushed for better demographic data collection on disability in healthcare overall. [...}

Letter From the Disability Community to CDC Director Rochelle Walensky

January 13, 2022

Dear Director Walensky,

The undersigned organizations write in response to your comments on Friday, January 7th, 2022.

Together we represent millions of people with disabilities, patients, and people with chronic illnesses across the United States, and we are extremely concerned by your comments. People with disabilities and pre-existing conditions have been disproportionately killed by COVID-19. This is particularly true for those who live in congregate settings. Each of these deaths is a devastating loss to families, friends and to our broader communities. Your comments about the results of a research study referred to the fact that a disproportionate number of deaths due to COVID-19 occurred among "people who were unwell to begin with" as "encouraging news". Weunderstand you were speaking about a research study and that segments of your remarks were cut by ABC from the aired interview. Your full remarks were subsequently released, and our concerns remain. [...]

DREDF Urges the Biden Administration to Rescind Georgia’s Section 1332 Waiver

January 12, 2022
On January 7, 2022, DREDF provided comment on Georgia's approved Section 1332 Waiver, which permits the State to exit HealthCare.gov—a central source of enrollment and enrollment assistance for the roughly 500,000 Georgians who enroll in private health plans or Medicaid through the platform. DREDF has serious concerns that this waiver does not meet the requirements of Section 1332 of the Affordable Care Act, as it will revert Georgia's healthcare enrollment into a system that forces consumers to search among a multitude of private, profit-drive web brokers and insurers in order to find coverage. This fragmented system will create new barriers to enrollment, eliminate neutral navigators, and result in increased enrollment in "junk" plans that do not meet an individual's needs. These harms will be particularly hard felt among Georgians with disabilities. We urge HHS and USDT to immediately rescind the waiver. [...]

Letter to the Board of Trustees of the Los Angeles Community College District (LACCD)

December 16, 2021
The undersigned are leaders and members of the disability community, and include representatives of key disability organizations. We write to urge the Los Angeles Community College District (LACCD) to abandon its dangerous plan to file a petition for certiorari with the United States Supreme Court in the Payan v. LACCD litigation. The proposed petition would challenge the very foundation of disability rights – that the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 prohibit unintentional forms of disability discrimination. The petition would conflict with LACCD's purported commitment to the inclusion of people with disabilities, and is not necessary to address and resolve the access problems demonstrated by the blind students who brought the case. Should the Supreme Court agree with LACCD that federal law prohibits only intentional forms of disability discrimination, more than 40 years of hard-fought-for civil rights of people with disabilities would be undone. [...]

Payan v LACCD Explainer

December 16, 2021
Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District is a case brought by blind students against the Los Angeles Community College District (LACCD). The students want the textbooks, handouts, websites, and other technology they use at school to be accessible to them. They sued in federal court under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. [...]