Foster Youth Higher Education Preparation and Support Act

March 30, 2012
Requests campuses of the California Community Colleges, California State University, and the University of California to designate a foster youth campus support program coordinator using new or existing resources to provide comprehensive support to all students who are current or former foster youth on public postsecondary educational institution campuses.

Section 48911.2 of the Education Code

March 22, 2012
SB 1235 requires schools with excessive levels of student suspensions (25% of more of their students or of any numerically significant racial or ethnic subgroup) to adopt school-wide evidence-based strategies to not only reduce school suspension and improve school climate, but also increase attendance and academic achievement.

Welfare and Institutions Code – Intellectual Disabilities

March 14, 2012
SB 1381 is a simple measure that provides an important terminology change to the disabled community throughout California. The term “mentally retarded” is outdated, pejorative, and not in current professional use in agencies, associations, and other countries. When it was originally introduced, the term “mentally retarded” or “mental retardation” was a medical term with a specific clinical connotation. However, today, the “R-word” is most commonly used to degrade or insult people.

GREAT Teachers and Principals Act

February 27, 2012
The Coalition for Teaching Quality has put forth a set of principles for ESEA reauthorization around preparing and supporting effective educators. Among these principles is a belief that all students are entitled to teachers who are qualified (fully prepared and fully certified), as well as effective; that preparation programs should be held to common, high standards; and that investments should be made in proven methods to recruit, prepare, develop, and retain fully prepared and effective teachers in shortage fields and hard-to-staff schools. S. 1250 undermines these principles.

Student Success Act

February 6, 2012
Rather than continuing to support students with disabilities in achieving a high school diploma and pursuing employment and postsecondary education, the elimination of the 1% regulation virtually encourages schools to expect less from students with disabilities.